Over the past few years, there has been a noticeable shift in how we think about teaching and learning. It is no longer just about delivering content in a classroom or uploading notes to Moodle. There is a growing expectation that learning should be interactive, engaging, and accessible beyond the physical space of the university.
At the Center for Learning and Teaching, DWU, this has led me to explore a simple but important question: How can we empower both lecturers and students to create meaningful digital learning experiences?
There is no shortage of tools available. From fully web-based platforms to PowerPoint-integrated solutions and advanced authoring software, the options can feel overwhelming at first glance. Each tool promises interactivity, ease of use, and seamless integration with learning management systems like Moodle. But in reality, not all tools are created equal, especially when working in a context like ours where access, training, and scalability matter just as much as features.
My goal is not to find the “most powerful” tool. Instead, I am looking for tools that strike the right balance between:
- Ease of use for lecturers who may be new to content authoring
- Accessibility for students who are complete beginners
- The ability to create interactive learning experiences
- Compatibility with Moodle through formats like SCORM
- Flexibility to work with existing materials such as PowerPoint
This is not just a technical decision. It is a teaching and learning decision. The tools we choose will shape how content is created, how students engage with it, and how sustainable our digital learning initiatives will be across campuses.
In this post, I will walk through a selection of authoring tools we are currently considering. In my pursuit to find the right tool for a reasonable budget for my needs I have found some very useful information which I will share and whether the tool is a practical fit for our environment.
If you have ever wondered which tool is worth your time to learn, or which one could realistically be adopted in your department, this comparison should give you a clearer starting point.
1. Articulate 360 Suite
What it is:
All-in-one eLearning platform (Rise = web-based, Storyline = advanced desktop). Supports quizzes, interactions, and SCORM export
Fit for our case:
✅ Lecturers: Good (with training)
⚠️ Students: Not beginner-friendly (especially Storyline)
✅ Interactivity: Excellent
✅ SCORM: Yes
⚠️ Web-based: Only Rise (Storyline is desktop)
π Verdict:
Strong but not ideal for student authors. Best for the Center for Learning & Teaching staff or trained staff, not beginners.
2. iSpring Suite
What it is:
PowerPoint add-in that turns slides into interactive courses with quizzes, simulations, and video
Fit for our case:
✅ Lecturers: Excellent (they already use PowerPoint)
✅ Students: Very beginner-friendly
✅ Interactivity: Good (quizzes, role-play, etc.)
✅ SCORM: Yes (very reliable)
❌ Web-based: No (desktop, PowerPoint-based)
π Verdict:
Best fit overall for our situation.
Low training barrier + fast adoption.
3. Evolve (authoring tool)
What it is:
Cloud-based, drag-and-drop authoring tool (similar to Rise but more flexible)
Fit for our case:
✅ Lecturers: Easy to learn
✅ Students: Good (intuitive UI)
✅ Interactivity: Good (prebuilt components)
✅ SCORM: Yes
✅ Web-based: Yes
π Verdict:
Very strong option if you want fully web-based + collaborative creation.
Better for scaling across campuses than Storyline.
4. SoftChalk Cloud
What it is:
Web-based lesson authoring tool used in higher education (quizzes, activities, simple interactions)
Fit for our case:
✅ Lecturers: Easy
✅ Students: Beginner-friendly
⚠️ Interactivity: Basic (not very modern)
✅ SCORM: Yes
✅ Web-based: Yes
π Verdict:
Good academically, but feels a bit dated.
Works, but not exciting for engagement.
5. Camtasia
What it is:
Video recording and editing tool (screen capture, tutorials)
Fit for our case:
✅ Lecturers: Easy
✅ Students: Easy
❌ Interactivity: Very limited (mostly video)
❌ SCORM: Not a full authoring tool
⚠️ Web-based: No
π Verdict:
Not an authoring tool replacement.
We may have to use it alongside something else (e.g. for video lessons).
6. Coassemble
What it is:
Cloud-based LMS + authoring tool with templates and gamified learning
Fit for our case:
✅ Lecturers: Very easy
✅ Students: Very beginner-friendly
✅ Interactivity: Good (templates, gamification)
⚠️ SCORM: Limited export (more LMS-focused)
✅ Web-based: Yes
π Verdict:
Great for simplicity and student use,
but less ideal if Moodle + SCORM is your core system.
7. ActivePresenter
What it is:
All-in-one tool for screen recording, simulation, and eLearning authoring
Fit for our case:
⚠️ Lecturers: Moderate learning curve
❌ Students: Not beginner-friendly
✅ Interactivity: Strong (branching, simulations)
✅ SCORM: Yes
❌ Web-based: No
π Verdict:
Powerful but too complex for your beginner goal. The free version does have a few features that allow you to create tutorial videos. Better for technical training (e.g. IT, software demos).
Quick Summary
| Tool | Beginner-friendly | Web-based | PowerPoint support | Interactivity | SCORM | Fit for DWU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Articulate 360 | Medium | Partial | Yes | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Yes | Good (staff only) |
| iSpring Suite | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Yes | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Evolve | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Limited | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Yes | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| SoftChalk | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | No | ⭐⭐ | Yes | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Camtasia | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | No | No | ⭐ | No | ⭐⭐ |
| Coassemble | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Limited | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| ActivePresenter | ⭐⭐ | No | Yes | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Yes | ⭐⭐ |





